Nonpolarizing Beamsplitter for OIC Contest
Every three years the OSA (Optical Society of America) holds a meeting called OIC (Optical Interference Coatings). As part of that meeting, there is always a design contest. The 2007 meeting has t...
The above requirements can be translated into seven continuous optimization targets. We give the first five targets more weight than the last two phase targets because it is best to meet the reflectance targets before worrying about phase. An important decision is the selection of the three coating materials. There are a total of 35 combinations of seven materials. Experience suggests that the three indices should be as widely separated as possible. Three good possibilities are the sets (1.38, 1.65, 2.35), (1.38, 1.8, 2.35), and (1.38, 1.65, 2.2).
Some experimenting finds that the indices (1.38, 1.65, 2.2) appear to work best, giving widest possible bandwidth of about 30 nm: 535 to 565 nm. As the bandwidth is increased, it becomes more difficult to keep both the reflectance and the phase differences within their required ranges.
In all of our designs, we start with a single thin layer and use TFCalc's needle/tunneling optimization to design the beamsplitter from "scratch". The plots below show the performance. Note that the phase differences are split across the last two plots.
上页  1  2  3  下页

验证码:        
版块示例
版块示例

版块示例

版块示例




© 2021 光学薄膜信息网    设置底部链接
Powered by DIY-Page 8.3